PCIe Verification Services
PCIe is the most ubiquitous high-speed interface in modern silicon. Each generation doubles bandwidth while making verification harder — tighter timing, deeper protocol state, FLIT modes, PAM4 signaling.
PCIe verification is rarely the glamorous part. It is very often the schedule-critical part.
covers
WHAT PCIe VERIFICATION INVOLVES
Protocol verification across the layer stack
Transaction, data link, logical PHY.
Verification IP (VIP) deployment
Testbenches around commercial or in-house VIP; knowing where defaults hide gaps.
Compliance-oriented testing
Spec-aligned test plans and checklists.
Functional coverage
Protocol state space coverage models, closure tied to sign-off.
Error and stress scenarios
Injected link errors, replay storms, malformed TLPs, surprise link-down, power races.
Interoperability
Behavior against real link partners and switches.
METHODOLOGY FLOW
GENERATIONAL EXPERTISE
PCIe verification expertise is generation-specific: what constitutes a credible test plan changes with each spec revision.
Our engineers have lived through multiple generations — we know where risk moves, what new features change, and how to focus verification where it matters most.
| 1 | Protocol functionality | All mandatory and optional features verified to spec. |
| 2 | Ordering | Completion and non-completion ordering rules. |
| 3 | Flow control | Credits, updates, and consumption across paths. |
| 4 | Credits | Advertised credits, return path, corner conditions. |
| 5 | ACK/NAK | Correct acknowledgments and NAK error handling. |
| 6 | Replay | Replay buffer behavior and recovery correctness. |
| 7 | Error handling | Malformed TLPs, poison, ECRC, and timeouts. |
| 8 | Link training | LTSSM, lane training, equalization, rate negotiation. |
| 9 | Power management | ASPM states, L0s/L1/L1.2, L0p (Gen6). |
| 10 | Surprise link-down | Recovery from unexpected link loss. |
| 11 | Coverage | Adequate coverage closure on all critical models. |
| 12 | Compliance | Spec-aligned test plan execution and checklist closure. |
| 13 | Interoperability | Interop with real partners and switches. |
| Risk | Example failure | Detection method | Sign-off evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol-state escape | Unexpected state transition or illegal TLP sequence | Assertions, state coverage, directed negative tests | State coverage closure, assertion zero failures |
| Credit accounting bug | Credits leak or underflow under stress | Random stress, scoreboarding, credit monitors | No credit mismatches in long runs |
| Replay/FEC interaction | Replay storm or FEC + retry corner breaks link | Fault injection, replay stress, mode-switch tests | Successful recovery across scenarios |
| Power-state race | Link fails to exit low-power state cleanly | Power state randomization, exit timing tests | Reliable entry/exit across all states |
| Interop divergence | Works with one partner, fails with another | Multi-partner interop matrix | Pass across approved partner matrix |