UALink Design & Verification Services | SNOVA

The problem UALink addresses.

Scale-up ≠ scale-out

Memory-semantic operations at far lower latency. Ethernet was not designed for this domain.

Ecosystem openness

An open standard lets vendors mix silicon the way PCIe and Ethernet did.

Architecture headroom

Pod sizes, topology, switch radix, and implementation decisions interact with the fabric spec.

Characteristic UALink Ethernet UEC
Domain Scale-up Scale-out
Connectivity Accelerator-to-accelerator Node / rack / cluster
Communication model Memory-semantic (load/store) Network / transport (packets)
Typical distance Intra-pod (short) Inter-node (longer)
Primary challenge Low latency, high bandwidth Scale, traffic, reliability
InfiniBand Widely deployed scale-out fabric for HPC and AI clusters.
PCIe Ubiquitous host–device interface inside the node.
UCIe Chiplet and die-to-die interconnect for adjacent silicon.
A system architecture question is rarely “which one?” — it is “which one, where?”

Where SNOVA contributes.

Scale-up architecture engineering

Endpoint integration, topology selection, and implementation choices that fit workload and silicon constraints.

Design

RTL design and integration for UALink protocol logic with clean interfaces and reuse in mind.

Verification

Protocol-level environments, compliance test planning, and coverage that targets real failure modes.

Adjacent-stack fluency

Ethernet/UEC and UCIe context so UALink verification is never an isolated activity.

UALink lifecycle.

UALink expertise is scarce; the specification is young and the engineers who understand both the spec and silicon-level implementation realities are few.

Related reading

ARTICLE

Scale-Up vs Scale-Out: How UALink and Ethernet Divide the AI Fabric

A practical look at when to use UALink, when to use Ethernet/UEC, and how they complement each other.

Discuss Your Scale-Up Architecture

Start the conversation with an engineer who understands the spec and the silicon.

Talk to an Engineer →